Iron age hoplite warfare and democracy

Latest campus free speech problem: Some speculation about why. Gwern asks any modafinil users reading this to take a survey about their response to the medication for his research.

Princeton University Press, This kind of discourse, once not uncommon, has fallen into desuetude. This trend seems now to be changing. Most significantly, both Iron age hoplite warfare and democracy works focus on non-elite elements in Greek society and politics subjects traditionally dominated by treatments of institutions and elite political interactionwith Hanson depicting the life and influence of the middling hoplite-farmer and Ober seeking to define the ideology of the poorer mass of Athenian citizens.

Iron age hoplite warfare and democracy

Despite all this common ground, however, their approaches to the ancient Greeks, and their conclusions about the ancient and modern world, could hardly be more different. However, Hanson has in fact offered far more than this, and in the end his work presents nothing short of a complete revision of the history of Greek culture--one that no future Greek historian will be able to ignore.

This yeoman farmer worked a small plot of ten to twelve acres of private land often land on the margins of cultivation in the previous Dark Age of horse-breeding and cereal productionand through his intensive cultivation of diverse crops especially the olive and the vine created surplus food for trade or sale in the polis, which in turn generated the wealth necessary for him to purchase the panoply of arms associated with the Greek citizen-hoplite.

Iron age hoplite warfare and democracy

Thus Greek culture and philosophy, as Hanson repeatedly states, did not originate in the garden of the Academy or in any sophisticated discussions in the city agora. This is not to say that Hanson does not treat Athens or the problems of demokratia extensively, but rather that Athens is placed on one end of a spectrum of polis governments that all shared certain similarities in both development and practice.

Depicting life on the small Greek farm of the polis period with careful attention to detail, Hanson moves easily from the large-scale problems of planting, harvesting, processing and sales, to the minutiae of pruning, fertilization and irrigation of individual plants, much of which must be a revelation to the non-farming academic The availability of relatively cheap: Moreover, this group was more than conscious of the economic realities of supply and demand, surplus and profit cf.

Particularly notable here is the lucid argument for the introduction of hoplite weaponry after the institution of phalanx-style fighting, and its connection with the surplus wealth associated with the new agrarianism of the period after Athenian democracy is seen as an extension of the idea of agrarian timocratic egalitarianism which considered relatively equal plots of land a desideratum to the landless thetes, who were nonetheless absorbed by the pervasive ideology of the hoplite-farmer Hanson writes in a clear, vigorous and impatient style, unfettered by jargon and with an intensity that clearly derives from passionate attachment to his subject, but which leads to some repetition of ideas.

His main thesis is hammered home repeatedly e. However, in a work of such scope one inevitably finds places to disagree. Hanson, of course, could argue that his ability to draw on material from such diverse periods in fact demonstrates the tenacious nature of the agrarian tradition in Hellas.

Such ubiquitous flight did not even occur in the American South during the Civil War, and in any event the passage of Thucydides cited here by Hanson cf. But despite the fact that moderns treat Spartan helotage as a lower form of servitude than that endured by other Greek slaves, I would imagine that to most Greek douloi, the position of a helot--farming his own piece of land even under heavy Spartan rents and with the occasional threat of Spartan terrorism--seemed closer to freedom than their own limited existence.

Throughout Hanson assumes that inter-polis wars in early Greece c. In any event, how will the farmers on the borders of any polis who would most clearly benefit from extension of the boundaries have convinced their interior-dwelling fellows to fight their battles if such an extension were the primary issue?

Hanson clearly recognizes that the creation of a pragmatic hoplite-farmer ideology must have post-dated the creation of the hoplite-farmer social matrix that spawned it And yet his faith in this ideology sometimes leads to questionable conclusions.

Disagreement over such points, especially in a very detailed work of or so pages including notes, should not be allowed to obscure the value of one of the most challenging and thought-provoking works on Greek history in a decade. Hanson has clearly identified a middle stratum of the Hellenic society and economy, one which arguably accounts for the creation of most of the political and social values we associate with ancient Greece and claim for ourselves.

The work, moreover, paves the way for further scholarship that will both draw on the experience of the scholar and speak eloquently to the society in which he lives.

By this method, according to Ober, [h]istorical studies grounded in contextual specificity can gain purchase in contemporary debates when informed by the concerns of normative theory.

Hoplite armor was expensive

And theory will be both tempered and strengthened by a confrontation with the pragmatic consequences of political thought and practice in a society that developed norms strikingly similar to those of modern liberalism, but predicated those familiar norms on radically unfamiliar grounds p.

Models may perhaps be helpful in the study of ancient societies when crucial evidence is lacking or ancient practices appear alien to modern eyes.Iron Age Hoplite Warfare brings about the First Democratic Societies in Archaic Age Greece, Following the Role of Monarchy, Feudalism and the Aristocracy As per the coverage in our course, in the Persian War, a Greek force from Athens set out to meet the invading Persian army at .

Greek hoplites and democracy: the new Greek hoplite soldiers had to buy expensive armor. Buying armor and training together made them feel more powerful, and hoplite soldiers in Athens and Corinth demanded more political power - more democracy.

Militaria Mart features a reputable dealer directory and resource site for collectors of militaria. The link about medieval fighting myths is wrong about leather armor and the ease with which chainmail is pierced.

Classical antiquity (also the classical era, classical period or classical age) is the period of cultural history between the 8th century BC and the 5th or 6th century AD centered on the Mediterranean Sea, comprising the interlocking civilizations of ancient Greece and ancient Rome, collectively known as the Greco-Roman is the period in which Greek and Roman society flourished and.

Iron Age Hoplite Warfare brings about the First Democratic Societies in Archaic Age Greece, Following the Role of Monarchy, Feudalism and the Aristocracy As per the coverage in our course, in the Persian War, a Greek force from Athens set out to meet the invading Persian army at 4/4(1).

Links 9/ Linkua Franca | Slate Star Codex